Quickie Review: Midnight in Paris

Woody Allen’s latest feature, Midnight in Paris, is a deft, if not brilliant return to form inspired by the City of Lights. He captures the excitement, energy and romance of a make-believe 1920s Paris, duly compensating for the movie’s lack of depth.

Gil (Owen Wilson) is a down-and-out screenwriter (a self-described “hand for hire”) sick of Hollywood on vacation with his fiancé Inez (Rachel McAdams) in Paris. Unhappy with his career, his impending marriage, and his present choice of decade, Gil morosely walks the streets of Paris, dreaming of his novel. When he stumbles upon a magical time-machine that transports him to interwar Paris, his life changes for the better—especially after he meets the lovely flapper Adriana (Marion Cotillard). Gil must ultimately choose between a good life back in the present or a bohemian one lived dangerously in the past. It’s this decision that drives the movie.

But Gil’s dilemma is not a hard one, and the ending leaves us with no surprises. This movie may not lend itself to deep analysis, but that is not why I recommend this film. It’s the delicious visuals, the surprisingly good caricatures of Moveable Feast regulars, the whole gestalt of 1920s Paris that Allen does so well. Go for Adrien Brody’s Dali impression, or better yet Kathy Bates’ Gertrude Stein. Go because you love Paris and can’t afford a plane ticket. It lacks the seriousness of You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger or the shtick of Whatever Works, but is nevertheless a treat, an Allen film shot through with optimism, a nostalgia trip that actually makes you feel good about living in the present.

Advertisements

5 responses to “Quickie Review: Midnight in Paris

  1. writer-at-heart

    This sounds good, and will see it for sure! How do you think it compares to his other films? So will this be widely shown, or do I have to go into Manhattan to see it?

  2. Well, the cast is amazing, and even if I don’t LIKE all Woody Allen films, I usually enjoy them, so I was planning to see this. Now even more so!

    Also, I had no idea there was a pseudo-time travel element to it.

  3. And don’t forget, there’s no creepy-old-man-gets-together-with-much-much-younger-girl! How novel NOT to experience this in a woody allen movie!

  4. Agreed! This movie could easily have felt trite, but it took the simplicity of the message and spun it in such a charming way. And I felt like Wilson was a great incarnation of Allen!

  5. Jon
    Splendid review As good as any I have seen in the new yorker! Not kidding..
    Having just seen te movie you summarized it
    Well
    Only woody could bring off the wet soppy
    Storylines with the right mix of
    Melancholy and wit

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s